I believe that his southern background played an important role in influencing him in adopting such an attitude. While I consider that it is perfectly normal for one to acknowledge the fact that southern colonies were an important battlefield in the war, it would be absurd to consider that Southerners are primarily responsible for the fact that the colonies were victorious.
In spite of the fact that Ferling's tendency to overestimate the importance of particular figures influenced me in thinking that he was not exactly accurate in his description of the War of Independence, the writer compensates through providing a clear explanation of the American victory. As long as one identifies the areas that Ferling is inclined to express prejudice in the respective reader is likely to enjoy reading the book, considering that it provided me with a generally academic account concerning the reason for which the American Revolution ended victoriously for the colonies.
I personally believe that Ferling exaggerates in his characterization of Washington and it appears that the writer is especially interested in downgrading his image. Ferling considered that Washington was unable to connect with other people and that he had a false personality. "Few ever got close to him, and in the real sense of the word Washington...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now